Late humanist photographer Henri Cartier-Bresson once told about photography
To me, photography is the simultaneous recognition, in a fraction of a second, of the significance of an event.
Indeed,
it is, from its very core. At every nook and corner, shutterbugs are found lurking
over their subjects just to capture those exquisite moments. Their eyes are all
affixed to this tiny square of a viewfinder. Their world becomes a captivation
of their own imaginations.
Some
people say photography is the most dynamic form of art in the 21st
Century. That’s why photographers are well revered all over the world. But in
19th century that story was a bit murky.
The Gloomy Period
That
era wasn’t any cake-walk for photographers. Critics always liked to castrate
photography as a form of art. They claimed a very unartistic amateur
photographer, armed with a good camera, is capable of producing perfectly
acceptable images. By contrast, a person who had no idea how to paint, sculpt
or carve, would have far greater difficulty creating an acceptable painting or
statue. So for this effortlessness, one question lingered in the minds- how
photography and art could be put in a same bracket.
Other
critics disagreed though. They said photography would have far greater impact
than a painting of the same scene. And because cameras capture reality, impact
is an important ingredient of camera art. Lastly, even if an untrained camera
operator manages to take an acceptable picture, it is unlikely to match the
creativity of a picture taken by a professional photographer. But these points
barely scratched a mark at that time.
That
is why photographers struggled a long way for artistic recognition
throughout the century.
The Dawn
But socio-economic and cultural
change made the paradigm shift for photographers. Their destiny had been
rewritten from the ashes of negligence. Science, invention and war changed the
entire social façade of the 20th century. People got enchanted by
the lively works of photographers. The grotesque images of civil war, the
horrors of a battle fields, and the social segregations were rightly framed. With
each succeeding war, as cameras became more advanced, the role of photography
has evolved to convey the realities of combat and the agonies inflicted,
primarily on the soldiers in the field. There is a tragic artistry to the
unforgettable pictures of the dead and wounded in the 20th century wars.
These lifelines could not be portrayed by paintings. And thus paintings and other forms of art
started to lag behind.
Capturing Reality
Some photographs are heroic. Some
tells horrifying truths.
Joe Rosenthal's iconic snapshot of Marines raising the flag at Iwo Jima in February 1945 is enshrined in memory as a prelude to victory. |
Silver Lining
There
is little doubt nowadays that photography, aside from its enormous variety of
uses, is legitimately considered a fine art discipline. Almost any well-known
and respected museum has sections dedicated solely to photographic art; and
there are a number of museums and galleries dedicated specifically to
photography. Photography finally stood on its ground and found its place in the
art world.
In
the last decades, photography's potential has radically expanded. The advances
and development of new technologies and new aesthetic theories combined with
the enhanced role of photography as a marketable commodity has influenced the
way the medium is now being used and perceived. The accepted and expanded state
of this medium is the result of a rich history in which photography flourished
even more by being so closely tied to developments in technology, in the arts,
and in the social sphere.
So Happy Clicking! And a Happy World
Photography Day!
A Brief History of Capturing Time: How Photography Became an Art
Reviewed by Arnab Naskar
on
Sunday, August 19, 2018
Rating:
Nice read :)
ReplyDeleteLovely
ReplyDelete